In a recent ruling, Justice Muazu scrutinized claims by Emefiele, highlighting several shortcomings. The judge noted Emefiele’s failure to provide adequate evidence supporting the necessity and inevitability of his medical journey.
Emefiele asserted that an invitation for medical treatment in the UK prompted his travel plans, yet he did not present a copy of this invitation to the court. Additionally, Justice Muazu pointed out that Emefiele did not demonstrate that his health condition warranted treatment abroad when adequate options were available locally.
Further complicating matters, Justice Muazu remarked that Emefiele faces charges in three separate court cases, adding a layer of complexity to the ongoing legal proceedings.
Further details to follow as the case develops.
